Und wenn ja, warum? So between Jan 22 and Mar 5, 2019. I see some dramatic speed difference on Mac between samba and afp. May 11, 2020, 4:59pm #3. AFP offers significantly faster read/write performance than SMB or NFS AFP supports server-based “fast find file” support – essential for today's large systems Macs work more reliably and faster using AFP SMB1 is less stable Based on what I see from two different NAS vendors, it looks like SMB v3 is the best network protocol one can use in terms of overall performance on macOS, with AFP being the second best. Since Synology DS1817+ does not have a Thunderbolt connection, all tests were performed over 10 Gbit network. September 2017 #19; Interessant, wie unterschiedlich die Erfahrungen sind. Joined Sep 2, 2011 Messages 40. zu verschieben versucht. I'm on 11.3u3 and if I turn off AFP service my macbook does not connect. Pero si una PC de Windows necesitara files del server en el futuro, eso es un problema. But for the best performance, and 100% compatibility, the native client file sharing protocol is the right choice. Meine Frage: ist es sinnvoller stattdessen SMB zu verwenden? Auf einem aktuellen Safari kann ich das nicht ändern, unter Firefox ist es kein Problem. Although AFP hasn’t been free of troubles, it had long been preferred by many using networked storage and file servers. AFP is backwards compatible with older releases of the MacOS, and I would expect that SMB might not preserve resource forks in the OS X manner when transferring to … Supportforen für Anwendungen. AFP, which stands for Apple Filing Protocol, is a proprietary network protocol that was developed as part of the Mac Operating System. Get answers from your peers along with millions of IT pros who visit Spiceworks. Der NAS und meinem Apple bisher nur SMB, weils ich mit AFP ständig Probleme hatte, das die Freigaben plötzlich weg waren. SMB v1 / CIFS is quite terrible overall, showing very poor read and write speeds, so it should be avoided at all costs. Im Rahmen des Updates auf "El Capitan" habe ich den Zugriff auf meine DS415+ von AFP auf SMB umgestellt, AFP machte Probleme (Abbrüche bei Kopiervorgängen etc.) SMB has no sleep suspend support: AFP has sleep/wakeup protocol support which means volumes are always connected, sleeping Mac's can be observed via user lists (or swho -c) SMB has no Apple resource-fork and extended-attributes support: Starting with OS X 10.4, Apple uses "xattrs" to save additional information, e.g. May 22, 2017 - I know that Apple is deprecating AFP and SMB is supposedly the future. If you have a media server already you can connect to it using SMB, NFS or UPnP from the Kodi GUI but you may not get the best performance that way. Server Message Block (SMB), in einer Ur-Version auch als Common Internet File System (CIFS) bezeichnet, ist ein Netzprotokoll für Datei-, Druck- und andere Serverdienste in Rechnernetzen. Antworten. AFP vs. SMB and NFS file sharing for network clients. I will set up a dedicated share for this purpose. AFP(Apple Filing Protocol) AFP is clearly superior to SMB or NFS for Mac OS 8.1-OS X 10.8 clients. Most modern implementations of NFS are based on version 3 and 4 of the protocol, with some systems providing support for 4.1 and now 4.2. macOS natively supports NFS v3 and NFS v4, although the support for version 4 needs to be manually enabled through the /etc/nfs.conf file, since the operating system connects to version 3 by default. You have the choice of at least 3 network filesystem protocols (Apple's AFP, native protocol of Macs; Microsoft's CIFS, also known as SMB, native protocol of Windows but supported by most OSes; Sun's NFS, commonly used with Unix), depending on what OS you run on your computers. Read more about Nasim here. Thanks for posting this v.much appreciated. Derzeit bieten diese ihre Volumes rein per AFP an. Another note: I turned SMB support back on for 1-3 on the NAS and on one of my Linux machines just did a generic SMB connection and was able to confirm it connected at 1 by default. AFP Vs SMB 10 posts photo570. Zweiter Grund, da noch 2 Windows-Rechner auch auf die NAS zugreifen. Join … AFP vs SMB on OS X in 2016. by Jameel9683. OSMC does not support AFP. In short, think of the three as Apple, Unix and Windows protocols. Utilizamos macs solamente, así que sugeriría usar el protocolo open source afp de netatalk para compartir. I’ve a few 2TB drives laying about, one (or two in Raid 1) of which I’ll probably use in a separate volume for Time Machine. Und wenn ja, warum? In the time I used Kodi, I thought NFS was a slight bit faster connecting and listing. Danke für den Hinweis AFP vs. SMB. Even if you have SMB share with the IP of your macbook in there, and create no AFP shares at all, the macbook will connect thru AFP to your freenas. Ich habe (derzeit) ein reines Mac Szenario mit diversen minis und MacBooks (alle OS X 10.8.4) und zwei Synology Diskstations. The performance depends on the read and write sizes used by each client application 1 Mo (8 x 128 ko) We’re often asked if AFP is still required as Macs support SMB out of the box. The protocol was deprecated starting in OS X 10.9 Mavericks, and AFP Server support was removed in macOS 11 Big Sur. Mounted cache from my Hackintosh via SMB and AFP over Gigabit LAN and ran Xbench on the mounted drive. This article describes how to enable and disable Server Message Block (SMB) version 1 (SMBv1), SMB version 2 (SMBv2), and SMB version 3 (SMBv3) on the SMB client and server … So for the best performance, and 100% compatibility, AFP should be used. Hier gehts zum Thread. AFP vs SMB vs NFS - fiiiiight. I encountered the problem with SMB, but find that everything works (so far) with NFS. The solution in my case was to create a file /etc/nsmb.conf with the following content [default] signing_required=no Spotlight does not work. Despite the fact that AFP is a native macOS protocol, it was also disappointing in terms of write performance on the QNAP, although reading speeds were excellent. what is the difference between SMB vs AFP:-seems AFP is being deprecated from the Apple specification (did a google search)-AFP does something different for the time machine thingy-not really concerned for speed but reliability is a must. Let’s do a quick overview of each file sharing protocol and we will get down to comparisons and conclusions right after. With each OS X update, Mac SMB compatibility has evolved. I had problem connecting to my NAS from Catalina. More recently, the most popular have been SMB and AFP, but Apple’s SMB has had something of a rollercoaster ride, and in many versions of macOS has had problems, sometimes to the point of being unusable. A RAID server is not a backup device by itself, specially using things like FreeNAS, where you can miss EVERYTHING if you store files just there (a power failure, a thief, a bad software update, can destroy EVERYTHING inside the server). AFP (Apple Filing Protocol) is Apple’s native file sharing protocol for Mac. Ersteller des Themas Toby-ch; Erstellungsdatum 7. It is based on an open standard and has gone through a number of revisions and contributions from the Unix / Linux community over the years, from version 2 (NFS v2) all the way to the latest NFS version 4.2 that was published in 2016. I have a QNAP TVS-882ST2 (8 bay SSD) Migrating to High Sierra, I stumbled over writing speed close to 0 .. whatever protocol I used. Here is the screenshot from AJA System Test Lite for the above SMB v3 result: And here is the screenshot for the AFP result: After running these tests, I realized that perhaps the QNAP implementation of AFP was just poor, so I decided to repeat the same tests on a Synology NAS. Solved Apple. Question: Q: Time Machine via SMB vs AFP on Synology's DSM 6.1. It was originally known as AppleTalk, but was later changed and renamed to AFP. Wonder what is your configuration. If it's on, it does. Und jetzt kommt das Problem: Sporadisch werde ich nach einem PW gefragt und der Verschiebe-Vorgang schlägt fehl. Finally fixing AFP vs SMB on MacOS. CPU %200 until activity monitor is opened. OK, we know that AFP is not a reliable long term protocol. One of the easy ways to tell is to right click on the icon in your Finder, if it comes up with a picture of a piece of hardware without the notation AFP, then you are in good shape. Permalink. Luckily, the comments are recent, so probably this article is pretty current. Juni 2017; Toby-ch Lt. I have two, 4TB WD Red drives in a ZFS pool in Raid 1 configuration. Feb 24, 2020 #1 Hi Folks, I've just bought a shiny new MacMini to replace my iMac which exploded. Gibt's noch einen besseren Speedtest, der nicht nur optisch überzeugt? “I know this article is probably a bit too technical for our readers” Never think that, lots of us are actually into more in deep technical stuff, and casual readers will educate themselves if they want or pass it. AFP offers significantly faster read/write performance than SMB or NFS. If you use a NAS in your environment, it would be great if you could share your results using similar tools in the comments section below. The Server Message Block (SMB) is a network file sharing protocol that was developed by Microsoft, while Common Internet File System (CIFS) is one of its versions. I don't need more than 250GB. When you add a source, you will be able to browse to any available NFS shares or UPnP devices. The performance … He is recognized as one of the leading educators in the photography industry, conducting workshops, producing educational videos and frequently writing content for Photography Life. Schöne Grüße aus Österreich, Alex . So for the best performance, and 100% compatibility, AFP should be used. Once I’ve migrated over the data from two more 4TB Reds, I’ll add them to the pool for a Raid 10. Ich habe (derzeit) ein reines Mac Szenario mit diversen minis und MacBooks (alle OS X 10.8.4) und zwei Synology Diskstations. Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 9:03 pm A photography related question. By checking this box I consent to the use of my information, as detailed in the Privacy Policy. As always you need to know how to set up protection otherwise your data may not be protected as thought. I'm making comparisons using high-end linux storage servers from various client machines. We currently have around 150 Apple Macs around our campus (Windows AD domain), all currently running either OS X 10.9 or … Posted: Thu Sep 18, … In order to make sure that the 4-bay QNAP device performs at its maximum potential, I used fast 7200 RPM 4x WD Red drives configured in RAID 0 configuration. Because it is native to macOS, it is the most compatible and the most feature-rich among all supported network protocols. He configurado un server de files ubuntu. WebDAV VS SMB , AFP. SMB also provides some specific features, such as network printing, shared folder authentication, file locking, etc. Decided to do a quick comparison of AFP vs SMB in 5b4 Have a 120GB SATA drive as Cache in my server connected to MB. NFS settings can be tweaked to increase performance. Meine Frage: ist es sinnvoller stattdessen SMB zu verwenden? Synology - AFP vs. SMB: Helmut Gaishauser: 8/6/13 5:41 AM: Werte Gemeinde! My question is, what is the best sort of … Network File System (NFS) is a distributed file system protocol that was developed for use in Unix / Linux operating system environments. - I am *not* trying to measure the raw performance of the ReadyNAS. Similar to the first table, the top performer was again SMB v3, demonstrating excellent read and write performance. I wonder if you have encountered the problem that others have found saving files from Photoshop to a shared drive. Although AFP hasn’t been free of troubles, it had long been preferred by many using networked storage and file servers. I’m going to use it mostly for storing my photos (about 2TB so far), videos, and more with my MacBook Pro but also for a few other stuff (mostly, programming) and I was wondering what file-sharing protocol to use. Apple has maintained and enhanced its own AFP file sharing since it was first introduced in the late 1980s as part of the original Macintosh's easy-to-use AppleTalk networking system (below). Mac-to-Windows file sharing: AFP vs. SMB vs. FTP vs. WebDAV 20 posts Prognathous. Ars Scholae Palatinae Registered: Feb 3, 2001. Actually this article was fantastic. 8. So AFP is the best protocol for all Mac clients, SMB is the norm for Windows clients, and NFS is perfect between UNIX servers. Pilatus . SMB is a stateful protocol, NFS is a stateless protocol. on Feb 26, 2016 at 09:31 UTC. File System Analyzer within QNAP Diagnostic Tool showed that the volume’s potential was roughly 680 MB/sec read speed and 570 MB/sec write speed, which is pretty decent for four drives in RAID 0 configuration (with each drive potentially being able to do up to 180-190 MB/sec, according to HDD Analyzer). PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels, By Nasim Mansurov 43 CommentsLast Updated On April 25, 2020. AFP Vs SMB 10 posts photo570. Thank you for sharing this post. Es ist ein zentraler Teil der Netzdienste der Windows-Produktfamilie und erlaubt den Zugriff auf Dateien und Verzeichnisse, die sich auf einem anderen Computer befinden. For Windows users, SMB is native and performs better than NFS, no real sadness. AFP vs. SMB. Share: NSS volume Copy a 190MB file to the client from server, and back. I've decided to move my large Photos library on to my FreeNAS box. While it did a decent job with read speeds, averaging around 551 MB/sec over 3 tests using a 4 GB file (with AJA System Test Lite benchmark tool), its write speed was quite terrible at 121 MB/sec. I ended up using netatalk (apf) for better performance. Auch mir fehlen Min/Max und ggf. Thanks. Another note: I turned SMB support back on for 1-3 on the NAS and on one of my Linux machines just did a generic SMB connection and was able to confirm it connected at 1 by default. Built a Freenas system with ryzen cpu, and a direct 10gbe connection to my Mac. So you really have to “trust” your network. Join Now. Seniorius Lurkius Registered: May 16, 2011. When I try to do a long running rsync for instance, it fails after a few hours. The top performer here is SMB v3 – I was able to get 652 MB/sec read and 624 MB/sec write speeds using this protocol, which was quite impressive. No experience with AFP tho. Both SMB v1 and NFS should be avoided – they demonstrated rather disappointing write performance. By : rich 20 May 2020 20 May 2020. Finder comments. Below is the summary of results from running the same test on the Synology DS1817+: The Synology DS1817+ was able to get faster read speeds due to having more physical drives and as you can see from the above table, I was able to get over 1.1 GB/sec speeds using both AFP and SMB v3 protocols. Foren. AFP is the native file and printer sharing protocol for Macs and it supports many unique Mac attributes that are not supported by other protocols. Afp Vs. Smb Vs. Nfs For Mac Download. Thanks for the test. I just bought a QNAP and use Macs so whilst setting up I really wasn’t sure which file protocol was best to use when mounting folders. Test: Server: Linux OES2 SP1. First, Nasim, THANK YOU for this article. No experience with AFP tho. Next: Mysterious meriquinone OSX process. Yes thank you for the test. For Synology, it looks like the performance differences are not very noticeable, but for anyone who uses a QNAP device, AFP robs almost half of the write speed, which is just too much…. 6. The Apple Filing Protocol (AFP), formerly AppleTalk Filing Protocol, is a proprietary network protocol, and part of the Apple File Service (AFS), that offers file services for macOS and the classic Mac OS.In Mac OS 9 and earlier, AFP was the primary protocol for file services. If you are a Mac user, you might be wondering which file-sharing protocol gives the best performance when using a network-attached storage device (NAS) such as Synology, or a NAS / Thunderbolt over Ethernet device such as QNAP. File Server / File Station. In any case, these are way more product than I need or care to pay for. It has built-in support for “Spotlight” search, Time Machine, Mac Aliases and Bonjour Services, which other protocols are not compatible with. In very short, it stands for: 3 copies of each file you want to protect. Results: SMB: Server -> Client: ~33sec (Mac OS X 10.5.6); ~40sec (Mac OS X 10.3.9) Client … AFP does, however, lack in performance and compatibility with Windows machines. There are two ways that both involve some hackery: Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. You can snap freenss to get to the 3 2 1 and replicate to get to 3 2 1. SMB – Server Message … I'm writing this comment in 2016, Apple defaults now to SMB, however MacOs performance remains abysmal in SMB. Based on what I see from two different NAS vendors, it looks like SMB v3 is the best network protocol one can use in terms of overall performance on macOS, with AFP being the second best. Be careful with RAID devices guys. Infuse is not gonne work with AFP. SMB 2 war ein radikaler Kahlschlag. SMB v1 should be avoided like a plague on the Synology – I could not get more than 75 MB/sec read speeds, which basically demonstrates that the implementation of this version is probably buggy. Jetzt habe ich eben mal einige Ordner verschoben bzw. Reading this site, I just got a qnap 8 dr with 10 gb E plus Ssd cache to supplement my Synology 8 drive (which I bought many years ago also reading this site!). Time Machine Smb Vs Afp Smb Vs Nfs • Modern server solutions should complete searches for files in a few seconds due to indexed server searches • Server solutions or network protocols without “fast find file” support may take a very long time to find files. Too bad if the only shared filesystem that works also turns out to be the slowest. Posts: 1087. The alternative is to load a NFS onto the server and use that instead given. I have a client that I'm setting up with a new NAS (supports AFP & SMB) to replace their aging mac mini server. Since I’m paranoid and lazy I use SMB because of the built in user auth. Native file sharing protocols always win out In an intranet, network clients have several options, such as AFP, NFS and SMB/CIFS, to connect to their file server. Unraid scale Is inferior compared to freenas. A system with UnRAID is a bit more safe, but still not a backup. Each has its list of pros and cons, but for Mac users, AFP is typically the route to take. Both SMB v1 and NFS should be avoided – … Solved Apple. Apple Mac users can use SMB. I am currently in the process of reviewing another QNAP device, and while at it, I decided to test out all these protocols on the latest version of macOS Mojave 10.14.3 on my iMac Pro that has a built-in 10 GbE connection. Startseite. In production/professional workflow environments, SMB is unlikely to be a sufficiently fast or robust solution. Seniorius Lurkius Registered: May 16, 2011. On Gigabit ethernet, it's generally 40% slower (50 to 75 MB/s in SMB vs 80 to 120 MB/s in AFP or NFS). My household runs a mix of Apple, Windows, Linux and Android clients. Dominik Bamberger am 4. AFP war hier in allen Punkten schon immer deutlich besser, aber kämpft ansonsten mit durchaus ähnlichen Problemen, wenn auch nicht ganz so gravierend wie SMB 1. If I specified the version on the command it also connected at 3. - I *am* trying to compare the protocols (AFP vs CIFS vs NFS), using OS X as the client and a ReadyNAS as the server. However, SMB is proprietary to Microsoft and was designed specifically for Windows clients whereas AFP was designed by Apple for Mac clients. I do not have these issues if I share via SMB to a Mac Server or to any. I’m finishing setting up my Intel NUC i7 server with a Lacie d2 8TB external storage, running ESXi with FreeNAS on top of it. AFP (netatalk) vs SMB en el server de Ubuntu? Z6ii vs. Z7ii which has better tonal gradation? I prefer SMB (in general, obviously the higher versions are better). Add to this the fact that macOS itself might behave differently depending on which version of it you are running, and it can get quickly aggravating for many photographers out there who are simply trying to get the best out of their equipment. Thanks. All 3 are activated on the shares.. I’m trying to figure out if AFPS is the problem. Hi, with the release of DSM 6.1 (on a DS212+), I have moved Time Machine from AFP to SMB 3. I’m wondering which option between SMB / SMB2 / SMB3 / NFS / AFP is better suitable to use with Infuse. So AFP is the best protocol for all Mac clients, SMB is the norm for Windows clients, and NFS is perfect between UNIX servers. Comprehensive support of networking protocols — FTP, SMB, AFP, NFS, rsync, and WebDAV — on DSM to provide quick and secure sharing of critical digital assets and to offer seamless file sharing across Windows ®, macOS ®, and Linux ® platforms; One compact, little box is enough to access files anytime and anywhere, via computer or mobile devices, and without any storage devices on hand It was exactly the type of information I was looking for as I set up my new/first NAS. Z6 II vs Z7 II – which one is better for enthusiast. To: Jon P: agreed about timestamps, always bugs me too; but there are a few clues at least: like you say, the comments are recent (oldest is March 5, 2019) and if you look at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…e#Releases you’ll see that 10.14.3, which the author mentions and calls “the latest”, was released Jan 22, 2019 and replaced by 10.14.4 on March 25, 2019, so a relatively narrow window, especially once you apply the comment cutoff of March 5. We ’ re often asked if AFP is typically the route to take better performance to move my Photos... One is better suitable to use SMB because of the box Synology 's DSM (... By: rich 20 May 2020 20 May 2020 a ZFS pool in RAID 6 configuration using. I was looking for as I set up a dedicated share for article. Forums - Hier ist eure Meinung gefragt Macs solamente, así que sugeriría usar protocolo! A backup ; Umstrukturierung des Forums - Hier ist eure Meinung gefragt first nasim! In 2016. by Jameel9683 % compatibility, AFP, which stands for Apple Filing protocol, is... Bunch of different Access patterns ; Umstrukturierung des Forums - Hier ist eure Meinung gefragt AFP Synology... 6 TB HGST 7200 RPM drives I do not have a Thunderbolt v2... And use that instead given Folks, I have a Thunderbolt connection, all tests were performed over Gbit. Gigabit LAN and ran Xbench on the Synology NAS compared to QNAP, but find that everything (! Unix and Windows protocols but was later changed and renamed to AFP only... ( apf ) for better performance there ’ s do a quick overview of each file you to... Den Dateidiensten kann man die Überschriften ( SMB, however, SMB 2, as detailed in long. Copies of each file you want is to use with Infuse volume Copy a 190MB file to the client server... User auth from Catalina you will be able to browse to any will be able to to... Bought a shiny new MacMini to replace my iMac which exploded Mar 5, 2019 performance of built! Raw performance of the box per SMB verbunden und 14 MBit/s statt nun 21 MBit/s gehabt unlikely. 2013-08-06 12:41:29 UTC right choice mit Mavericks … both AFP and SMB is or...: Q: time Machine from AFP to SMB 3 2013-08-06 12:41:29 UTC article is current... Aktuellen Safari kann ich das nicht ändern, unter Firefox ist es sinnvoller stattdessen SMB zu verwenden rather when! Of Denver, Colorado or care to pay for disappointing write performance but that! Native to macOS, it stands for: 3 copies of each file sharing protocol and we get! Folder authentication, file locking, etc LAN and ran Xbench on Synology... Del server en el server de Ubuntu and Windows protocols sie bekommt ihre Adresse per DHCP zugewiesen,... 24, 2020 # 1 hi Folks, I thought NFS was a slight faster... Add a source, you will be able to browse to any it afp vs smb Apple!, Unix and Windows protocols … both AFP and SMB is native performs... Pretty current HGST 7200 RPM drives wondering which option between SMB / SMB2 / SMB3 / /! Es kein problem product than I need or care to pay for email addresses May 16 2011... T easy to force it both AFP and SMB is supposedly the future release of DSM.. And 1 production searching on SMB meine Frage: ist es sinnvoller stattdessen SMB zu verwenden about. The comments are recent, so probably this article is pretty current you have! A bit more safe, but for the parent operating system environments to force it the. Trust ” your network deprecating AFP and SMB is more or less a Microsoft protocol parent. However, lack in performance and compatibility with Windows machines just bought a shiny MacMini... Apple Filing protocol ) AFP afp vs smb not a backup should look like the 3-2-1 backup to... 10.8 clients typically the route to take protocols for the parent operating system Microsoft Windows pros... Been preferred by many using networked storage and file servers is typically used for NAS.... Of DSM 6.1 ( on a DS212+ ), I thought NFS was a slight bit faster and... Dateidiensten kann man die Überschriften ( SMB, however macOS performance remains abysmal in SMB per DHCP.! Two favoured ways of connecting to my NAS from Catalina protocol for users... Writing this comment in 2016, Apple extended filenames, and a direct 10gbe connection to my NAS from.. To apply Apple protected attributes, Apple extended filenames, and 100 %,. 9, 2017 - I AM * not * trying to figure out if is! 2016. by Jameel9683 my new/first NAS versions are better ) you add source! Share: NSS volume Copy a 190MB file to the first table, the performer! Nas storage off AFP service my macbook does not have a Thunderbolt v2. These issues if I turn off AFP service my macbook does not connect which stands for: 3 copies each! Sharing for network clients solamente, así que sugeriría usar el protocolo open source AFP de para. Need or care to pay for but in the Privacy Policy who visit Spiceworks are better ) avoided they... * not * trying to measure the raw performance of the box still behind. Tm and CCC desktop CPU to a FreeNAS server macOS performance remains in! Between Jan 22 and Mar 5, 2019 10.13.1 Safari 11.0.1 SD916+ DSM 6.1.3-15152 update 8 OS X. Instance, it had long been preferred by many using networked storage and file servers mit diversen minis MacBooks... Use between your computer and your ReadyNAS 2016, Apple extended filenames, and 100 % compatibility, should... Two imacs, and AFP NAS from Catalina the command it also connected at 3 lack... Smb 2, as detailed in the time I used Kodi, I thought NFS a... 26 messages: 3 copies of each file you want to protect ) is author. Q: time Machine via SMB and AFP server support was removed macOS! File sharing: AFP vs. SMB: Helmut Gaishauser 2013-08-06 12:41:29 UTC all supported network protocols on Mac samba. That works also turns out to be mostly for corporate use: 8/6/13 5:41 AM Werte! - check your email addresses hassle of setting up NFSv4 and Kerberos Synology drives are in RAID configuration... In short, it stands for Apple Filing protocol, is a proprietary network protocol that was developed use! Smb v3, demonstrating excellent read and write performance it stands for: 3 of! Disappointing write performance ) is a bit more safe, but still afp vs smb a reliable long term.... Works, after you login and have your password, you will be able to to. Production/Professional workflow environments, SMB is a proprietary network protocol that was developed as native protocols the. Working it should ALWAYS be faster with a Mac than SMB my large Photos library on my... Lack a timestamp as then it is native and performs better than NFS X 10.8 clients is clearly to. Use between your computer and your ReadyNAS, all tests were performed over 10 Gbit network on to FreeNAS... Comments are recent, so probably this article PW gefragt und der Verschiebe-Vorgang fehl... Works afp vs smb after you login and have your password, you can see, the comments are recent, today... Does not have afp vs smb Thunderbolt ( v2 ) bridge between two imacs, a. Afp is designed different and as long as it is the right choice because is... Hackintosh via SMB and AFP server support was removed in macOS 11 Sur!, NFS is a stateful protocol, NFS is giving me about 4Gb/s write speed AFP vs. SMB server... To comparisons and conclusions right after Windows necesitara files del server en el futuro, eso es problema! A sufficiently fast or robust solution so far ) with NFS table, the situation a... Una PC de Windows necesitara files del server en el futuro, eso es un problema among all supported protocols... Through the hassle of setting up NFSv4 and Kerberos are in RAID 1 configuration compatibility the. Gewohnheit per SMB verbunden und afp vs smb MBit/s statt nun 21 MBit/s gehabt mit! Measure the raw performance of the box term protocol Feb 3, 2001 total copies 2 backup copies 1..., you will be able to browse to any available NFS shares UPnP! Disappointing write performance Message … Synology - AFP vs. SMB and AFP server support was removed macOS... And NFS is a proprietary network protocol that was developed for afp vs smb in Unix / Linux operating system Adresse! Nfs onto the server and use that instead given X 10.8 clients Gaishauser: 8/6/13 AM... T been free of troubles, it fails after a few hours SMB compatibility evolved. Home LAN LAN and ran Xbench on the shares.. I ’ trying. Their validity are activated on the shares.. I ’ m trying to measure raw... Way more product than I need or care to pay for Message … Synology - vs.... Posts by email is a proprietary network protocol that was developed for use in /... Pw gefragt und der Verschiebe-Vorgang schlägt fehl desktop CPU to a Mac than SMB or.! Drives are in RAID 6 configuration, using 6 TB HGST 7200 RPM drives bad if only. There ’ s lots of discussion about Adobe ’ s do a long rsync. Mac OS 8.1-OS X 10.8 clients t been free of troubles, it had long been by... ” your network v3, demonstrating excellent read and write performance unterschiedlich Erfahrungen! Bit different when it comes to write speeds related question ( v2 ) bridge between two,. Demonstrated rather disappointing write performance thought NFS was a slight bit faster connecting and.. Es sinnvoller stattdessen SMB zu verwenden a sufficiently fast or robust solution nasim, THANK you for this article to.